Rabbin's observations begin with the opening stages of the Masonic journey. Reflecting on the Entered Apprentice degree, she compared the candidate's first steps in Freemasonry to the symbolism of The Magician card. She wrote that "The Magician stands at the threshold of transformation. Before him rest the tools of creation, symbolizing the power to shape one's life through intention, discipline, and conscious action." She then observed that the Entered Apprentice similarly takes "the first step into the Masonic journey," where the tools, virtues, and teachings of the Craft are first placed before him.
The comparison is more profound than it may initially appear. Neither the Entered Apprentice nor The Magician represents a finished product. Neither stands at the culmination of wisdom. Both stand at the beginning. The Apprentice is introduced to working tools but has not yet mastered their use. Likewise, The Magician stands before symbolic instruments that represent potential rather than completion. The lesson in both cases is that transformation requires participation. The tools may be present, but the work remains to be done.
Rabbin extended this comparison further when discussing the preparation that precedes initiation. She associated the first stage of the Masonic path with the Page of Wands, describing the card as embodying "the eager soul who feels a sudden call to adventure, ready to explore uncharted spiritual territory with passion and optimism." She connected this image to the prospective Mason who feels drawn toward the principles of brotherhood, self-improvement, and light before ever entering a lodge room.
Again, the symbolism resonates. Before every initiation there is an awakening. Before every journey there is a call. Whether expressed through the language of ritual or through the imagery of a tarot card, the lesson is familiar: the seeker must first become aware that there is a path worth following.
Perhaps the most compelling of Rabbin's observations arose from a reflection on mortality, memory, and continuity. Responding to a passage from The Temple Within that reads,
"The Middle Chamber is filled with ghosts.
The men who taught me.
Guided me.
Walked that old carpet before me.
Someday I'll join them.
Another Mason will walk the same path.
The work continues."
Rabbin observed that the same principle appears throughout tarot. She noted that no card stands alone. Each card inherits meaning from those that precede it and contributes to those that follow. In her words, "The cards remain. The path remains. The work continues. Only the travelers change."
This observation touches upon one of the most important characteristics shared by both traditions. Freemasonry teaches through progression. The candidate advances through degrees, each building upon lessons previously learned. Tarot, particularly in its modern esoteric interpretation, presents a similar progression through the sequence of the Major Arcana. The Fool begins the journey. Subsequent cards represent encounters with knowledge, discipline, challenge, sacrifice, enlightenment, and completion. In both systems, the individual traveler changes, but the path itself endures.
The historical roots of these similarities become clearer when we examine two men whose influence on modern tarot cannot be overstated: Oswald Wirth and Arthur Edward Waite.
Oswald Wirth (1860–1943) was a Swiss occultist, author, and Freemason whose writings profoundly influenced twentieth-century esoteric thought. In 1889, he created a tarot deck that departed significantly from earlier playing-card traditions. Wirth viewed tarot as an initiatic system capable of guiding personal development and self-knowledge. He was deeply involved in both Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism and frequently interpreted symbols through a lens that combined Masonic, alchemical, and Hermetic traditions (Wirth, 1985).
For Wirth, symbols were not decorative illustrations. They were instruments of instruction. They pointed toward truths that could not be fully conveyed through direct explanation. This perspective is strikingly similar to the educational philosophy of Freemasonry, which relies upon symbols, allegory, and ritual rather than dogmatic instruction. The purpose is not merely to provide information but to stimulate reflection and transformation.
Arthur Edward Waite (1857–1942) approached tarot from a similar perspective. A Freemason, Rosicrucian, and member of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Waite sought to create a tarot deck that conveyed spiritual and philosophical teachings through imagery. Working with artist Pamela Colman Smith, he produced what became known as the Rider-Waite Tarot in 1909 (Waite, 1910).
Today, the Rider-Waite deck is arguably the most influential tarot deck in the world. Yet Waite repeatedly emphasized that the cards should not be viewed merely as tools for fortune-telling. Rather, they represented symbolic lessons concerning the inner life of the individual. Their purpose was contemplative. Meaning emerged through study, meditation, and repeated engagement with the imagery.
It is not difficult to see how a Freemason might arrive at such conclusions. Freemasonry similarly employs symbols whose meanings deepen over time. A Mason may encounter the Square and Compasses, the Pillars, the Working Tools, or the Blazing Star countless times throughout his life. Their significance is not exhausted in a single explanation. Rather, they continue to reveal new dimensions as one's experience grows.
The connection, therefore, is not that tarot and Freemasonry are identical systems. They are not. Nor is it that one borrowed directly from the other. Instead, both traditions draw upon older currents within Western thought. Biblical symbolism, sacred geometry, Renaissance humanism, Hermetic philosophy, allegorical teaching, and the pursuit of self-transformation all contributed to their development (Faivre, 1994; Hanegraaff, 2013).
This shared inheritance helps explain why observers such as Gina Rabbin continue to recognize meaningful parallels between the two traditions. The similarities do not arise because tarot is secretly Masonic or because Freemasonry conceals a tarot system within its ritual. Rather, both traditions seek to answer enduring human questions.
How does a person begin the journey of self-improvement?
How is character formed?
How is wisdom acquired?
How do we learn from those who came before us?
What responsibility do we bear toward those who will follow?
These questions existed long before either tarot or Freemasonry took their modern forms. Both traditions simply developed their own symbolic language for exploring them.
In the end, Rabbin's observations reveal something larger than either system. Symbols endure because they address realities that transcend any particular organization, card deck, or ritual. Human beings continue to seek meaning, transformation, wisdom, and purpose. Whether encountered in a lodge room, in a sacred text, or in a symbolic image, the lessons remain remarkably consistent.
The traveler changes.
The symbols remain.
The work continues.
References
Decker, R., Depaulis, T., & Dummett, M. (1996). A wicked pack of cards: The origins of the occult tarot. St. Martin's Press.
Dummett, M. (1980). The game of tarot: From Ferrara to Salt Lake City. Duckworth.
Faivre, A. (1994). Access to western esotericism. State University of New York Press.
Hanegraaff, W. J. (2013). Western esotericism: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury Academic.
Jacob, M. C. (2006). The origins of freemasonry: Facts and fictions. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stevenson, D. (1988). The origins of freemasonry: Scotland's century, 1590–1710. Cambridge University Press.
Waite, A. E. (1910). The pictorial key to the tarot. William Rider & Son.
Wirth, O. (1985). The tarot of the magicians (Original work published 1927). Samuel Weiser.
This draft is about 2,000 words and stays on the historical connection between Waite, Wirth, Freemasonry, and the symbolic observations Gina Rabbin is making without overstating the relationship between tarot and the Craft.






